Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Basics, Functionality, and Effective Protection Measures

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is a complex and extremely relevant security problem on the Internet that is significant for developers, administrators, and end-users alike. This detailed article explains in detail what CSRF means, how the attack vectors work, what risks and potential damages are associated with such attacks, and how systems can protect themselves against such attacks. Additionally, this article addresses various W-questions to convey as complete a picture as possible:

W-questions about CSRF:

• What is CSRF?

• Who is affected by CSRF?

• When and where does CSRF typically occur?

• Why is CSRF dangerous and how do such vulnerabilities arise?

• How can CSRF be effectively detected and prevented?


To deeply inform the reader, individual aspects of CSRF will now be detailed.

  1. Introduction and Background

Cross-Site Request Forgery, often abbreviated as CSRF, refers to a type of attack in which an attacker tricks the browser of an authenticated user into performing unwanted actions on a website where the user is logged in. This technique often exploits the trust relationship between the user and the respective web application to initiate harmful requests. Unlike classic attacks, which usually exploit vulnerabilities in the software, CSRF takes advantage of the fact that browsers automatically send authentication cookies or session tokens when the user is already logged in.

Historically, security vulnerabilities in web applications were initially addressed through SQL injection or Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). With the further development of modern web applications, request manipulations like CSRF came into focus. The increasing connectivity and the operating environment where users engage on various websites provide attackers with numerous opportunities to implement CSRF attacks. This problem affects not only websites with sensitive banking or financial data but also everyday communication portals, social networks, and web applications where simple transactions can be made.

  1. Mechanisms and Functionality of CSRF

To better understand the concept of CSRF, the scenario of a forged form is often used. The attacker creates a webpage containing a form that sends a request to a target website, where the user is authenticated, either upon loading or through a hidden mechanism in the background. If browsers automatically send such requests with valid cookies, the attacker gains access to what would otherwise be legitimately authorized by the user. As a result, the attacker could execute transactions, change settings, or retrieve private information.

It is important to understand that CSRF attacks do not necessarily rely on a security vulnerability in the software but on the way the web browser implements standard requests and authentication mechanisms. Modern browsers have APIs and security policies that are largely standardized. However, missing verification steps on the server side—such as checking a so-called CSRF token—can create vulnerabilities for these attacks.

In many attack scenarios, an attempt is made to get the end user to visit a specially prepared webpage. Once there, a legitimate action on another webpage is performed in the background without the user noticing. In many cases, the user discovers too late that their data has been compromised or transactions initiated fraudulently. The consequences can be not only financial but also have a lasting impact on trust in online services.

  1. Detailed Examination of Attack Vectors

Attackers often use several tactics in CSRF to ensure that their malicious actions are successful. The most common techniques include:

• Automated filling of forms: By using prepared hyperlinks, GET requests, or automated POST requests, a website can be manipulated in the background.

• Image tags, iframes, and JavaScript: Invisible iframes are often embedded, executing actions on a target page. It does not matter whether these actions are implemented as GET or POST requests.

• Use of social engineering: In addition to purely technical methods, attackers often rely on psychological tricks to entice users to click on malicious links or visit unsafe pages. For example, an attacker could post a link on a popular social network that seems harmless but triggers a critical transaction in the background.


W-questions frequently asked in this context include:

• Who is often targeted by a CSRF attack? – Particularly users who perform various sensitive actions in multiple browser sessions are at risk. Administrators and developers working in environments with insufficient security measures are also frequent targets.

• What makes CSRF so dangerous? – The main danger lies in the potential to manipulate large amounts of data, trigger transactions, and thereby permanently damage users' trust in web applications.


  1. Technical Details: How does a CSRF attack work?

On a technical level, a CSRF attack typically begins with initiating a cross-site request. This can occur through manipulated HTML elements, such as a form whose action attribute points to a designated URL that effects a critical change on the target platform. Often, no additional authentication occurs since the browser already possesses valid session data.

A central element of defense against both is the implementation of anti-CSRF tokens. These are special, dynamically generated tokens added to a form and transmitted during the transfer. The server then verifies whether the submitted token matches the originally generated one. If this comparison fails, the request is rejected as invalid. The concept of the token represents an additional security barrier that significantly complicates an attacker's ability to carry out CSRF attacks.

  1. Protective Measures and Best Practices

Important strategies for protecting against CSRF attacks encompass numerous technical and organizational measures. Among the most effective countermeasures are:

a) Use of synchronizer tokens: The implementation of anti-CSRF tokens in forms and API calls is the most prevalent protective measure. These tokens should be randomly generated and tied to each user session. This ensures that an attacker cannot simply guess or reuse the correct token.

b) Use of SameSite cookies: Modern browsers support the

Your partner in cybersecurity
Contact us today!